In shortJOC places individually scoped job orders within a competitively bid IDIQ framework. In the traditional design-bid-build comparison used here, each project is designed and bid separately. Compare the work and your agency’s rules before choosing a method.[1][2]

The structural difference

JOC is a competitively bid, firm-fixed-price, indefinite delivery / indefinite quantity construction delivery method used for repair, maintenance, renovation and minor construction. Individual job orders sit within that contract framework. The competitive award and the pricing of a particular work package are different steps.[1][2]

For this comparison, traditional design-bid-build means a project is designed and then bid through its own solicitation. One-off bidding likewise treats the particular project as a separate procurement. This is a structural comparison, not a description of every procedure an agency might call traditional procurement.

In JOC, the shared price book and contractor’s bid coefficient provide the pricing basis for individual orders. In the separate-project approach, the project’s solicitation is the point at which its work is put out to bid. Start a comparison by locating where competition occurs and how the particular work receives its price.

How JOC prices different jobs

A unit price book lists tasks, units of measure and unit prices. Unit prices include direct material, labor and equipment costs, but not indirect costs or profit. Contractors bid a coefficient or coefficients covering costs outside those prices, such as general and administrative and other overhead, insurance and bonding.[3][2][4]

For each selected line item, multiply the book unit price by the quantity and applicable contractor coefficient. Add the calculated line amounts to obtain the job order price. A shared book does not make two jobs cost the same: their selected tasks and quantities can differ.

Because both parties price from the same book, negotiation is mostly about selected items and quantities. The written scope must therefore identify the work clearly enough to support those selections. A contract framework is not a substitute for identifying what is included in the individual job.

Compare the framework, not promised outcomes

Use the comparison below to identify the documents and decisions needed for your work. Do not treat the delivery method’s name as evidence that a particular project will be faster, cheaper or better. Establish the scope, pricing basis and review responsibilities before making the procurement decision.

Structural comparison for this guide
QuestionJOCSeparate-project bidding
What is competitively awarded?A contract framework supporting individual job orders.The particular project through its separate solicitation.
How is the work defined?An individual scope within the framework.Project-specific design and bid documents.
How is JOC work priced?Selected book items × quantities × bid coefficient.Evaluate the project-specific bid and pricing instructions.
What needs review?Scope, entry selections, quantity support and applicable factor.The project documents, bid requirements and proposed price.

Where the structure may fit

For an owner facing recurring repair or maintenance needs, evaluate whether a common framework matches the work you intend to order. List the tasks, sites and people who will develop scopes and review proposals. Then check whether the proposed program documents support those needs.

For a large, unique or highly designed project, a traditional project-specific bid may be a better choice. Treat that as a question for the people responsible for design and procurement, not a universal exclusion from JOC. Identify the design decisions that must be resolved and the agency rules governing the available methods.

Compare the clarity of the proposed scope under each approach. Can the work be described and measured for the intended pricing basis? Who will settle design questions, define boundaries and review the proposed work? If those answers are missing, choosing a method does not fill the gap.

Consider facility backlogs and recurring work

Questions to answer before deciding

Prepare a short decision record with the intended work, available procurement methods and the documents your agency requires. Ask the responsible procurement and legal reviewers to resolve authority questions. Keep the basis for the choice separate from unsupported expectations about performance.

For a contractor, evaluate the actual solicitation rather than assuming that all JOC programs use identical instructions. For an owner, identify the staff who can perform site meetings and pricing review. Both approaches need a defined work package and people responsible for making decisions.

  • Work: what locations, tasks and design decisions need to be included?
  • Authority: which methods are available under the agency’s rules?
  • Pricing: which documents establish the price for this work?
  • Review: who checks scope boundaries, quantities and proposed pricing?
  • Issuance: what action authorizes the contractor to proceed?

Review the JOC fundamentals

Programs vary; check your agency’s rules, solicitation and contract for applicable requirements.

Sources

  1. Cassell and Gilday, "Improving the Army's Job Order Contracting Program" (1997)
  2. Arizona State University, "Job Order Contracting Performance" (2015 report)
  3. Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFARS), "Subpart 5117.90 - Job Order Contracts"
  4. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Transatlantic Middle East District, "Old contracting tool leads to new successes in Kuwait"
Next guideHow job orders work